星期日, 6月 30, 2019

聖經考古 電台訪問 (共 3 集) - 商業一台雷霆881大玩派-另類考古發掘的有趣事

這是2014年8月11日,我接受商業一台節目主持人基斯(Christopher)的邀請,做了一個live電台訪問。在沒有任何預備之下,立刻回應關於考古、聖經、信仰的不同問題。

重溫時,當然感到當時許多的回答可以更精確,但是,仍非常感謝能與幾位DJ對談,多謝基斯當年的邀請,可以在空中暢談聖經考古等問題,做聽眾對這方面有點得益。

現在將原本的錄音作後製,希望對你有幫助。我也曾經使用部份訪問作聖經考古或主日學或護教學教材。

因影片長 50 分鐘,分成 3 集,每集約 15 分鐘







4 則留言:

Sam Harmonica 說...

Mark Sir, 录音中,提及亞当可能不是第一位人类,可否提供些參考資料?這对我了解上古的家庭際度及 创6: 1-4都很有帮助,又藉此多謝你在主里的考古研究。

Mark Chan 說...

創世記 1-3 章的「人」、「那人」、「亞當」意思是指作為人類的代表,照 John Walton 的解釋,「人」或「亞當」是代表(archetype),而不是單單一個人。例如,創世記 1:27 神以神的形象創人,原文是 ha-adam,即人類,所以意思不必是一個人,而是人類。亞當是人類的代表,不只是單單一個人。這樣,我們無必要把創世記 1-3 章,想像為只有兩個人(亞當和夏娃)。所以,創世記 4 章中,該隱的妻子,不必是亞當夏娃的女兒,不必是兄妹結婚,不必是亂倫關係;該隱怕別人報復,也就不一定指怕亞當、夏娃或他的弟妹。

Sam Harmonica 說...


Dear Mark sir, thanks for your reply. Being a layman born again Christian over 40 years , I keep myself open-minded for different theological hypothesis, such as calvinism vs arminianism.
About Bible Interpretation of Genesis and Creation of Mankind, John Walton is one of the leading theologists. Though I don't completely agree his book "Lost World of Genesis One" but the contents are worth further study.
Again, thanks for sharing your fruitful archeology research without reservation. It has also become my trust Bible study resource. God Bless. Sam

Mark Chan 說...

Sam, I am glad you are reading Walton's Genesis book. I do think the traditional literalistic interpretation imposes modern literalism on to the ancient biblical texts, hence creating unnecessary issues for us to deal with. The comparative approach seeks to compare ancient cosmological texts with biblical cosmological ones. All the ancient near eastern accounts of the creation of humanity focus on the creation of archetypal humanity. I think this line of biblical interpretation not only avoid unnecessary debates regarding the early history of humanity, but also corrects the tendency of modern anachronism by reading the text with ancient eyes. Thanks for your comments and the desire to engage with the sacred text. Thanks for reading my blog!